A before-and-after pair shows a result but not the work. Write a short story between the photographs: what was wrong, why, what was done, what it took, and what to look at in the after.

Two photos and the word after

The gallery is a row of pairs. A cracked driveway, then a smooth one. A cluttered kitchen, then a bright one. Under each pair, two words: before and after.

The pairs are the most persuasive material on the site, and the owner knows it. Each one stands for days of work, a problem solved and a customer pleased.

None of that reaches the visitor. They see two photographs and have to guess what happened between them.

The fix is a short piece of writing for each pair, saying what was wrong, what was done and what it took.

What the visitor cannot tell

Faced with a pair and nothing else, a visitor is left with questions the photographs cannot answer.

The fourth is the one that turns admiration into an enquiry. A visitor who recognises their own problem in the story has a reason to call; one who only admires the result moves on.

The story in five parts

The writing between the photographs does not need to be long. Eighty to a hundred and fifty words covers most jobs, in five parts.

The starting point: who the customer was and what they wanted, in their own words if possible. The cause: what was really wrong, which is often not what the before photograph shows.

The decisions: what was done, and why that rather than the obvious alternative. The effort: how long it took, how many visits, what it disrupted.

The result in use: not how the after looks, but what the customer can now do, or no longer has to put up with.

What the camera could not see

The before photograph shows a symptom: a stained ceiling, a sagging gate, a cracked tile. The cause is usually somewhere the camera never went.

The stain came from a bathroom fan venting into the attic. The gate sagged because its post had rotted below the soil. The tile cracked because the floor flexed beneath it.

Say so in the story. A visitor with the same symptom learns that you look for causes rather than surfaces, and why the cheaper fix they had in mind might not have lasted.

A worked example

A bike fitter working from a small studio behind a bicycle shop posts before-and-after photographs of riders on their bikes, side-on, with lines marking the angles of knee, hip and back.

To the fitter the difference is obvious. To anyone else the two photographs look almost identical: the same rider, the same bike, the saddle perhaps a little higher.

So the fitter now writes a short story for each pair. A rider in their fifties whose knees ached after an hour. A saddle too low and too far forward, and cleats that turned the feet inward.

Then what was changed: the saddle raised and moved back, a shorter stem, the cleats rotated, about two and a half hours in the studio and a follow-up visit a month later.

The story ends with the result in use, in the rider's own words from that follow-up. Under the after photograph, two captions point at the knee angle and the reach, so a visitor knows where to look.

What it took

The part most often left out is the effort. Visitors cannot judge a result without some idea of what it took to reach.

Say how long the job took, how many visits, whether the customer had to move out or go without something, and what made it harder than usual.

Where prices are published elsewhere on the site, a rough band helps too. Where they are not, the effort alone tells a visitor whether this was a small fix or a major project.

Effort also explains price. A visitor who has read that the floor had to be lifted and the joists strengthened understands why the quote was more than a tiling job.

Point at what changed

Many good results look ordinary. A level floor, a door that closes, a dry basement wall: the after photograph shows nothing remarkable, because the work is in what is no longer wrong.

A short caption on the after photograph solves that. One line pointing at the gap that has closed, the line that is now straight, the stain that has gone.

Without it, visitors hunt for the difference and may settle on the wrong one, or none.

Where the words go

Put the writing between the two photographs, or directly beside them, rather than in a block at the bottom of a gallery page.

On a phone the pair stacks, one above the other, and the story belongs where the eye moves from one picture to the next.

Give the best pairs a page of their own, with the story as real text. A gallery of images tells search engines very little.

A page about drying out the basement of a 1970s split-level, on the other hand, can be found by someone with the same basement.

Ask the customer's permission for the photographs, and for any words of theirs you quote.

The counter-case

Some pairs speak for themselves. A graffiti removal or a pressure-washed deck needs a line, not a story, and visitors understand the work at a glance.

A business with dozens of small, similar jobs need not write up every one either. A handful of well-told stories, with the rest of the gallery captioned in a line each, is enough.

And words cannot fully rescue weak photographs.

For the pairs that matter, though, write what was wrong, what was done and what it took, and put it between the photographs.

For the next pair

  1. Write the complaint in the customer's words.
  2. Name the real cause in a sentence.
  3. Say what was done and why.
  4. Describe what it took in time and visits.
  5. Add the result in use, not just the look.
  6. Caption what to look at in the after.
  7. Place the story between the photographs.

Step four gets skipped more than any other, yet visitors need it to judge everything else. Without some idea of the effort, a good result looks easy and an honest quote looks expensive.

Capturing these details while they are fresh is covered in the project write-up done the week the job ends.

Frequently asked questions

Why are unexplained before-and-after photos weak?

Visitors cannot tell what was wrong, what was done, what it took or whether their own problem is similar, so the work behind the result stays invisible.

How long should the writing be?

Eighty to a hundred and fifty words covers most jobs: the starting point, the real cause, the decisions, the effort, and the result in use.

What if the real work was hidden?

Say where it was. The before photograph shows a symptom, and the cause is often behind a wall, under a floor or in the attic, where no camera went.

Which part is most often left out?

The effort: how long the job took, how many visits, what it disrupted. Without it, a good result looks easy and an honest quote looks expensive.

What if the after photo looks ordinary?

Add a short caption pointing at what changed, such as the closed gap or the straightened line. Otherwise visitors may settle on the wrong difference.

Where should the story go?

Between or beside the two photographs, where the eye moves from one to the other, and on a page of its own for the best pairs.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

A gallery of pairs with no words?

Send us three of your best pairs. We will show you the questions each story needs to answer.

Start a Conversation