Move the health history to a secure online form, keep consent for the first visit, make the physician referral a fillable PDF, and stop asking patients to print or fax anything.

The site

A physiotherapy clinic with four treatment rooms, upstairs from a pharmacy in a medical building. Its site is tidy: a page for each therapist, a list of conditions treated, hours, a map and a phone number.

The New Patients page is where it changes. It asks every new patient to complete three forms before the first appointment: a health history, a consent to treatment and a direct billing authorisation.

Each is a PDF. The instructions say to print them, fill them in by hand, and fax them to the clinic or bring them along, arriving fifteen minutes early.

A fourth PDF, a referral form meant for physicians, sits in the same list.

The inference a visitor makes

Someone with a sore back, reading on a phone at work, wants to know how soon they can be seen and what the first visit involves.

They find instructions they cannot follow from where they are. The phone has no printer and no fax, and the PDF opens as a tiny page that needs pinching to read.

The reasonable inference is that the clinic runs on paper, is a little behind, and that the first visit will begin on a clipboard.

Some will book anyway. Others will try the next clinic in the results, hoping for an easier start.

What the forms ask a patient to do

The third is easy to overlook from the clinic's side. A patient with a wrist injury or a frozen shoulder is asked to write two pages by hand before treatment starts.

A phone cannot print

Many visits to a clinic's site now come from phones, and a new patient reading about the clinic during a break is a typical one.

On a phone, every step of the instructions fails. The PDF can be opened and read with effort, but not filled in, signed, printed or faxed.

So the only route left is the clipboard at reception. The page meant to save time at the first visit ends up adding to it.

Scans that cannot be typed into

Even on a computer, these PDFs are pictures of paper. They were made by scanning printed forms, so there are no fields to type into, and the text blurs when enlarged.

A fillable PDF, with proper fields, would at least let someone at a desk type the answers and print a clean copy. It still needs a printer, but the handwriting problem goes.

The scans are also large files, slow to open on a phone connection, for pages that are mostly empty lines.

A fax tray in a busy reception

Faxed health histories arrive on a machine behind the front desk, often while other patients are standing at the counter.

A page listing someone's medications and past surgeries can sit in the tray for an hour before anyone files it. One wrong digit sends it to a stranger's machine.

Privacy law expects safeguards that match how sensitive the information is, and few things a business holds are more sensitive than a health history. The fax route makes that harder, not easier.

Typing it all in again

Whatever arrives by hand or by fax still has to be entered into the clinic's software by someone at reception.

Handwriting is misread, dates of birth are transposed, and a medication spelled three ways becomes a question for the therapist at the start of the appointment.

The clinic pays for the same information to be written twice, once by the patient and once by its own staff.

A worked example

A new patient booked by phone for a shoulder injury and opened the New Patients page on her phone on the bus. She could read the forms, barely, and do nothing else with them.

She arrived ten minutes early, as asked, and spent twenty minutes at reception writing with her good hand. Her appointment started late, and so did the next patient's.

The clinic changed the health history first. It became a web form, served over HTTPS, that places each submission in the clinic's patient records system instead of sending it as an ordinary email to the front desk.

Consent stayed in the clinic, where the therapist explains the treatment and the patient signs after asking questions. The website now shows the consent form as a readable page in advance.

The referral form became a fillable PDF, since physicians' offices still send referrals by fax. Billing details are now copied from the insurance card at the first visit.

Which forms belong online

The health history is the best candidate. It is long, it benefits from typing, and it is what makes first visits start late. It must travel over HTTPS and arrive somewhere access is limited, not in a shared inbox.

Ask only what the first visit needs. Every extra question online is another sensitive detail stored somewhere.

Consent to treatment is better completed in person, after the conversation it records. Showing it on the site in advance lets patients read it without pressure.

Forms meant for other professionals, such as physician referrals, can stay as fillable PDFs, clearly separated from the patient forms.

The counter-case within the site

Some patients prefer paper, and some will always arrive without having done anything in advance. The clipboard does not disappear; it becomes the fallback rather than the only route.

An online form also brings duties the fax seemed to avoid: secure hosting, limited access and a decision about how long submissions are kept.

Done properly, it is still the better arrangement. Move the health history online with privacy in mind, keep consent in the room, and stop asking anyone to print or fax.

What to change

  1. Move the health history to a secure web form.
  2. Serve every form page over HTTPS.
  3. Deliver submissions away from shared inboxes.
  4. Show the consent form as a readable page.
  5. Make the referral form a fillable PDF.
  6. Separate physician forms from patient forms.
  7. Remove print and fax instructions for patients.

Step three is where clinics most often stop short. A secure form that ends in an ordinary email to a reception inbox has moved the risk rather than reduced it.

Testing the new form on a phone, all the way to its confirmation, is covered in a form confirmation shown off the screen.


Frequently asked questions

Why are PDF forms a problem on phones?

A phone cannot print or fax, and a scanned PDF cannot be filled in or signed on screen. The only route left is the clipboard at reception.

Which clinic form should move online first?

The health history. It is long, benefits from typing and is what delays the first visit. It must be sent over HTTPS and stored where access is limited.

Should patients sign consent online?

Consent is better completed in the clinic, after the explanation it records. Showing the form on the website in advance lets patients read it without pressure.

What is wrong with faxed health forms?

They arrive on a machine at a busy front desk, can sit in the tray for an hour, and one wrong digit sends them to a stranger.

Is a fillable PDF good enough?

For physician referrals, yes, since doctors' offices still fax them. For patients it fixes handwriting but still needs a printer, so a web form serves them better.

Where should online form submissions go?

Into a system with limited access, not an ordinary email to a shared reception inbox. Otherwise the secure form has moved the risk rather than reduced it.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Patient forms that need a printer?

Send us the forms you use now. We will tell you which can move online safely and which should stay.

Start a Conversation